Managers, All Other in New Hampshire
May 2025 wages · tax year 2026
You keep
$110,804
after federal, FICA and New Hampshire tax
Tax takes
$34,826
23.9% of the whole
Worth, in national money
$105,182
New Hampshire costs more than average
On that salary you would be around the 25th percentile for this work in New Hampshire — roughly, since only five points along the band are published.
One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.
Median here
$145,630
Kept after tax
$110,804
Worth in national money
$105,182
State rank
14
of 51 states
What this pays, and what it is worth
- Pay for managers, all other is strong here. New Hampshire's middle earner gets $145,630, putting the state 14 of 51 — about 2.63% ahead of the national figure.
- Within New Hampshire this is well-paid work. Of 488 occupations with published figures in the state, managers, all other ranks 14 — in the top quarter of everything people do there.
- The wage here flatters the reality. From $145,630 the take-home is $110,804. But New Hampshire costs more than the national average, so that money behaves more like $105,182 would elsewhere. Worth knowing before comparing offers across states. The average is higher, $151,720, because the best-paid pull it up.
- For managers, all other, New Hampshire sits in the upper band nationally: a median of $145,630, ranking 14 of 51 and running about 2.63% above the national midpoint. Nominal advantage of this size is usually, though not always, large enough to survive the state's own tax and price levels.
- Ranked against every occupation New Hampshire publishes a median for, managers, all other sits 14 of 488 — the upper quartile of the state's wage distribution. National standing and within-state standing are separate questions, and a job can occupy very different positions on each.
- Retained pay after federal, FICA and New Hampshire income tax is $110,804 for managers, all other, from $145,630. The state's price level exceeds the national average, so the price-adjusted equivalent is $105,182. ⚠️ This is purchasing power and not a wage; cross-state offer comparisons that stop at the nominal figure systematically overvalue high-cost states. The mean of $151,720 sits above the median, the right skew typical of wage data.
Compare this career across states
Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.
Pay band: Managers, All Other
The state median for this job
| Lowest tenth earn under | $83,050 |
|---|---|
| Half earn under | $145,630 |
| Top tenth earn over | $216,320 |
| This salary | $145,630 |
Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.
The same pay, somewhere else
The state median for this job
| Take-home in New Hampshire | $110,804 |
|---|---|
| Take-home in Texas | $110,804 |
| Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity | +$8,843 |
The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.
State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.
What you would need there
The state median for this job
| To match take-home only | $145,630 |
|---|---|
| You could take a cut of | −$12,573 |
| Prices in Texas | 97 vs 105 |
State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.
Sources and assumptions
- A median is the middle, not an offer. Half of managers, all other in New Hampshire earn under $145,630 and half over. The published range runs $83,050 at the tenth percentile to $216,320 at the ninetieth. Experience and employer move an individual a long way inside that.
- That $110,804 take-home in New Hampshire comes from $145,630. It is the no-frills case: single filer, standard deduction, nothing set aside before tax. Real circumstances almost always reduce the tax. City and school-district taxes are not counted at all. Locally the work ranks 14 of 488.
- One number stands for prices across all of New Hampshire, which is a simplification — big cities cost far more than small towns. Read $105,182, the adjusted value of that $145,630 median, as a way to compare states fairly, not as a quote for any particular place. The two datasets are also from different years. This job sits at 14 of 488 in the state.
- Figures are distribution medians for managers, all other in New Hampshire, not entry or offer rates. The published band runs $83,050 to $216,320; within-state dispersion of that width routinely exceeds the dispersion between states, so tenure, employer and metropolitan area predict an individual's pay better than geography does.
- Retained pay of $110,804, from $145,630, assumes a single New Hampshire filer with the standard deduction and no elective deferrals. Pre-tax retirement or HSA contributions, dependants and itemized deductions all reduce it further; local income taxes, excluded here, would increase it in the states that levy them. This occupation ranks 14 of 488 locally, and the state ranks 14 of 51 for it.
- Price deflation uses one statewide parity for New Hampshire, so $105,182 — the adjusted value of that $145,630 median — establishes comparability between states rather than accuracy within one. The wage and parity series are dated independently, each following its own publication cycle, and neither is projected forward. This occupation sits at 14 of 488 locally.
Questions people ask
Is this the average pay for the job?
Half earn more than this and half earn less. The average sits at $151,720 because a long tail of high pay lifts it, so the two answer different questions.
Why is the pay range for this job so wide?
Because one job title covers very different work. The bottom tenth here earn $83,050 and the top tenth $216,320 — experience, employer and specialism separate them, and a single figure hides all three.
Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?
The number and the value are different things. New Hampshire costs more than the national average, so this take-home stretches like $105,182 rather than its face figure.
Is most of this wage taxed away?
Most of it arrives. $110,804 lands after tax, since there is no state income tax on wages here — though the federal floor is identical in every state.
Can I compare this job across every state?
This occupation is published everywhere — all 51 of them — so comparing states measures real differences rather than gaps in the data.
How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?
The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in New Hampshire is $151,720. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.
What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?
Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($83,050) and the ninetieth ($216,320) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.
How does the state price level affect real compensation?
New Hampshire's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $105,182 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.
Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?
New Hampshire levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $110,804 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.
Is this occupation's state coverage complete?
State-level estimates are published for all 51 jurisdictions for this occupation, so cross-state comparison is not confounded by suppression. ⚠️ Estimates remain survey-based and carry sampling error; small differences between adjacent states should not be over-read.