Training and Development Managers in Washington
May 2025 wages · tax year 2026
You keep
$122,923
after federal, FICA and Washington tax
Tax takes
$40,437
24.8% of the whole
Worth, in national money
$113,228
Washington costs more than average
On that salary you would be around the 25th percentile for this work in Washington — roughly, since only five points along the band are published.
One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.
Median here
$163,360
Kept after tax
$122,923
Worth in national money
$113,228
State rank
3
of 48 states
What this pays, and what it is worth
- Washington is one of the better-paying states for this job. The middle earner takes $163,360, which ranks 3 of 48 states with published figures. That is about 22.83% above the national middle.
- Locally, this pays well. Among 493 occupations Washington reports, this job comes in at 20 — comfortably in the upper quarter.
- Washington is an expensive state, and the adjusted figure shows it. From $163,360 the take-home is $122,923; in national-average money that behaves like $113,228. The average comes to $169,480, above the middle, thanks to the top of the range.
- Washington ranks 3 of 48 states publishing a median for training and development managers, at $163,360 — about 22.83% above the national median. A state's position on nominal pay is the figure wage tables report and the least informative of the three on this page, because it survives neither the tax adjustment nor the price adjustment intact for most occupations.
- Training and development managers ranks 20 of 493 occupations by median in Washington, in the top quartile. Within-state position is largely independent of national position, so this holds regardless of how the state compares to others for the same work.
- Take-home for training and development managers in Washington, on $163,360, is $122,923; deflated by the state's price level, $113,228. ⚠️ The deflator is statewide, so it understates the erosion in the state's metropolitan areas and overstates it outside them. At $169,480 the mean overshoots the median — the usual right-skewed shape.
Compare this career across states
Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.
Pay band: Training and Development Managers
The state median for this job
| Lowest tenth earn under | $101,680 |
|---|---|
| Half earn under | $163,360 |
| Top tenth earn over | $249,030 |
| This salary | $163,360 |
Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.
The same pay, somewhere else
The state median for this job
| Take-home in Washington | $122,923 |
|---|---|
| Take-home in Texas | $122,923 |
| Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity | +$13,268 |
The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.
State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.
What you would need there
The state median for this job
| To match take-home only | $163,360 |
|---|---|
| You could take a cut of | −$18,864 |
| Prices in Texas | 97 vs 109 |
State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.
Sources and assumptions
- A median is the middle, not an offer. Half of training and development managers in Washington earn under $163,360 and half over. The published range runs $101,680 at the tenth percentile to $249,030 at the ninetieth. Experience and employer move an individual a long way inside that.
- That $122,923 take-home in Washington comes from $163,360. It is the no-frills case: single filer, standard deduction, nothing set aside before tax. Real circumstances almost always reduce the tax. City and school-district taxes are not counted at all. Locally the work ranks 20 of 493.
- The wage data and the price data come from different years. That is how each is published. The price adjustment behind $113,228 uses one figure for the whole of Washington. A city and a rural county there can differ by more than two states do. Out of 493 occupations the state publishes, this one sits at 20.
- Figures are distribution medians for training and development managers in Washington, not entry or offer rates. The published band runs $101,680 to $249,030; within-state dispersion of that width routinely exceeds the dispersion between states, so tenure, employer and metropolitan area predict an individual's pay better than geography does.
- Retained pay of $122,923, from $163,360, assumes a single Washington filer with the standard deduction and no elective deferrals. Pre-tax retirement or HSA contributions, dependants and itemized deductions all reduce it further; local income taxes, excluded here, would increase it in the states that levy them. This occupation ranks 20 of 493 locally, and the state ranks 3 of 48 for it.
- Wage and price series carry different reference periods, each published on its own schedule. The real-terms figure of $113,228, worked from $163,360, deflates by a statewide parity that conceals substantial intra-state variation, concentrated in housing — so it supports comparison between states rather than the pricing of a move to a particular Washington address, on work sitting at 20 of 493 locally.
Questions people ask
Is this the average pay for the job?
It is the midpoint, not the average. The average here is $169,480, dragged up by high earners; the middle figure describes a typical worker better.
Why is the pay range for this job so wide?
One title, many jobs. The lowest tenth take $101,680, the highest tenth $249,030, and what separates them is experience, employer and what exactly the role does.
Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?
A larger wage in a dearer place is not automatically more. Adjusted for local prices, this pay behaves like $113,228 of national purchasing power.
Is most of this wage taxed away?
Less than people assume. $122,923 of this wage reaches your account, because Washington takes no income tax from wages — but federal tax, Social Security and Medicare still apply exactly as they do everywhere else.
Why is this job missing from some states?
Because the survey suppresses a figure when too few employers report it. This occupation has published pay in 48 states — the rest are withheld to protect confidentiality, which is not the same as nobody doing the work there.
How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?
The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Washington is $169,480. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.
What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?
Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($101,680) and the ninetieth ($249,030) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.
How does the state price level affect real compensation?
Washington's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $113,228 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.
Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?
Washington levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $122,923 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.
Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?
BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 48 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.