Reynoldsburg to Columbus
Ohio municipal income tax, Chapter 718 framework · credit set by Reynoldsburg ordinance · tax year 2026
Work city takes
2.5%
Columbus, on income earned there
Home city charges
2.5%
Reynoldsburg, residents
Credit back
$1,500
a share of the work tax
Cost of the commute
$0
a year, above working at home
What it costs you
no extra local taxReynoldsburg credits only part of what Columbus takes, so the remainder is taxed twice. Solid is what you pay; the faded part of the Reynoldsburg bar is the credit it hands back. Municipal income tax only — state, federal and payroll tax apply on top, and an Ohio school district income tax may too.
What this commute actually costs
- Here is the good news. Working in Columbus costs you nothing extra in local tax. Reynoldsburg charges residents about 2.5%, and it credits back every dollar Columbus collects from you. Either way your bill is $1,500 a year. What changes is which city keeps the money, not how much of it you hand over.
- This one is balanced on a knife edge. What Columbus takes is exactly what Reynoldsburg is willing to credit — no more. It costs you nothing today. It would cost you from the very first dollar if either city moved its rate.
- Plenty of towns feed Columbus. There are 50 of them in this data, and Reynoldsburg ranks 6 by worker count with roughly 9,085 making the trip. The size of a route tells you about traffic. It tells you nothing about the tax.
- Around 9,085 workers make this trip from Reynoldsburg into Columbus. It is one of the busier commutes in the state, which is part of why it gets a page of its own.
- This pairing is neutral to the worker. Columbus withholds about 2.5% on income earned there, and Reynoldsburg, which levies about 2.5% on residents, credits that payment in full without reaching its own ceiling. Liability at the reference salary is therefore $1,500 — precisely what the same earnings would attract with no commute at all. What the arrangement alters is the division of revenue between Columbus and Reynoldsburg, not the sum leaving the worker's pay.
- This pairing sits exactly on its limit. Columbus's rate and the ceiling Reynoldsburg places on its credit coincide to the cent, so the credit absorbs the work-city tax precisely and not a dollar further. The commute is costless today and has no margin whatsoever: any increase by Columbus, or any reduction in the ceiling by Reynoldsburg, falls directly on the worker from the first dollar.
- Columbus is a major regional workplace, drawing recorded flows from 50 separate origins in this dataset. The route from Reynoldsburg ranks 6 among them by worker count, at roughly 9,085. Rank is not a proxy for tax outcome: every origin faces the same Columbus rate, and what differs between them is the home municipality's credit, so a smaller route can carry a considerably worse result than a larger one.
- Census origin-destination statistics record approximately 9,085 workers commuting from Reynoldsburg to Columbus, placing this among the larger intra-state flows in Ohio. The outcome set out above therefore has aggregate fiscal consequence for both municipalities, not merely individual consequence for the worker: the credit Reynoldsburg does or does not extend is applied to every one of them at once.
Where the money goes
A $75,000 salary
- Federal income tax$7,670
- Social Security and Medicare$5,738
- State income tax$1,346
- Yours$60,246
| Federal income tax10.23% | $7,670 |
|---|---|
| Social Security and Medicare7.65% | $5,738 |
| State income tax1.79% | $1,346 |
| Yours80.33% | $60,246 |
The arithmetic, step by step
| Columbus takes, on income earned there | $1,500 |
|---|---|
| Reynoldsburg charges residents | $1,500 |
| Less the credit Reynoldsburg gives back | $1,500 |
| Total local tax | $1,500 |
| If you also lived in Columbus | $1,500 |
| Difference | $0 |
On a reference salary of $60,000 a year. Both rates and the credit ceiling are shares of income, so every figure scales with your own pay.
What this page does not cover
- Do not add the two rates up, and do not assume the bigger one simply wins. Neither is how Ohio works. Both Columbus and Reynoldsburg charge you. Reynoldsburg may then hand back what Columbus took, or part of it, or none of it. Everything on this page turns on which of those it does.
- These figures rest on a local rule, not a state one. Reynoldsburg decides how much credit to give for tax already paid to Columbus. It is worth confirming the current position with the city or its collection agency, because this is the part most likely to have changed.
- This page covers city income tax only. Your school district may charge its own on top, and many in Ohio do. That one follows your address in Reynoldsburg rather than your workplace in Columbus, and it is not credited against anything.
- These figures are the local layer alone. Whatever Reynoldsburg and Columbus take sits on top of state, federal and payroll tax. Those three are the same wherever in Ohio you work, so putting them in would bury the difference this page is about.
- The dollar figures rest on one assumed salary, sixty thousand. Double your pay and they double. Halve it and they halve. What stays put is the relationship between what Columbus charges and what Reynoldsburg gives back, which is the part worth carrying away.
- Two misreadings bracket the correct answer and both are common. Ohio does not simply add the two rates together, which would overstate the charge; nor does it apply only the higher of them, which is Pennsylvania's rule and would understate it wherever the credit is partial. Columbus taxes what is earned within its boundaries, Reynoldsburg taxes its residents on everything, and Reynoldsburg then credits some, all or none of what Columbus collected. The credit is the entire mechanism, and it is set by Reynoldsburg rather than by the state.
- The credit rule modeled here is Reynoldsburg's own, adopted by ordinance and amendable by Reynoldsburg alone. Ohio's uniform framework governs definitions, filing and withholding; it does not compel any municipality to credit tax paid to another. A council vote in Reynoldsburg can therefore change every figure on this page without anything altering in Columbus or in state law, which is a materially different exposure from a rate set by statute.
- Ohio school district income tax is a separate levy from municipal income tax and is excluded from these figures. It is imposed by school district of residence rather than by municipality, it is unaffected by employment in Columbus, and no municipal credit applies to it. A resident of Reynoldsburg whose school district levies one owes it in addition to everything shown here, which is why the totals on this page are a municipal position rather than a complete local one.
- Only municipal income tax is modeled. Ohio's state income tax, federal income tax and payroll taxes all apply in addition and are invariant to the boundary between Reynoldsburg and Columbus, which is precisely why they are excluded: isolating the layer that responds to the commute is the point of the comparison. A complete tax position requires adding them; a comparison of the two locations does not.
- Dollar figures are computed against a stated reference salary of sixty thousand rather than a municipal wage average, which no published source provides for Ohio municipalities. Both rates and the credit ceiling are proportional to income, so every figure scales linearly: the Reynoldsburg to Columbus differential doubles at twice the salary and halves at half of it, and the rate relationship holds at every level. The one caveat is that whether the ceiling binds at all is itself scale-invariant here, because it too is expressed as a share of income rather than as a fixed dollar cap.
Questions people ask
Do I pay local tax twice — once where I work and once where I live?
Both places charge you, but the city you live in gives back some of what the other one took. Columbus taxes you for working there at about 2.5%; Reynoldsburg then charges its own about 2.5% and credits part of the first against it. Whether anything is left over depends on how generous that credit is.
Does working in a different town cost me anything?
Nothing extra. The tax is redirected rather than increased, so this particular crossing costs you no more than working in Reynoldsburg would.
Is this a common enough commute to be worth modeling?
Yes — 9,085 people make this exact journey, according to the federal employment survey that tracks where workers live against where they work. Routes below a volume floor are not published, so a page existing here means the commute is real and measured.
Both towns charge the same — does the boundary matter at all then?
Not to your total. Reynoldsburg and Columbus both levy about 2.5%, so the amount is settled either way — what the boundary decides is which authority receives it, and that is an accounting question rather than a cost to you.
How does a resident credit allocate liability between two municipalities?
Both jurisdictions assert a claim: Columbus on the basis of work location at about 2.5%, Reynoldsburg on residence at about 2.5%. The residence municipality grants a credit for tax paid to the work municipality, commonly capped as a share of income. Net liability is the residence tax less that credit, floored at zero, plus the work tax.
Why is the marginal cost of this crossing zero?
Marginal liability from working outside the residence jurisdiction is zero on this route. The crossing alters the distribution of revenue between jurisdictions but not the employee's total. ⚠️ This is route-specific and does not generalise to other pairs in the same dataset.
What is the basis for including this route?
Route volume is 9,085 workers, sourced from Census LODES origin-destination data. Pairs below the publication threshold are excluded rather than imputed, so page existence reflects measured commuting volume.
What is the effect of identical rates either side of the boundary?
Both jurisdictions levy about 2.5%, so the governing rate is identical regardless of which rule allocates it. The boundary affects revenue attribution between authorities, not employee liability.