Industrial Production Managers in Arizona
May 2025 wages · tax year 2026
You keep
$93,856
after federal, FICA and Arizona tax
Tax takes
$30,954
24.8% of the whole
Worth, in national money
$92,830
Arizona costs more than average
On that salary you would be around the 25th percentile for this work in Arizona — roughly, since only five points along the band are published.
One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.
Median here
$124,810
Kept after tax
$93,856
Worth in national money
$92,830
State rank
20
of 50 states
What this pays, and what it is worth
- Middling, nationally. Arizona pays industrial production managers around $124,810 at the midpoint, 20 of 50 states. The interesting numbers on this page are the two below it.
- Within Arizona this is well-paid work. Of 491 occupations with published figures in the state, industrial production managers ranks 27 — in the top quarter of everything people do there.
- Cost of living is unremarkable here. From $124,810, tax leaves $93,856, and adjusting for local prices barely moves it — about $92,830 in comparable terms. Averages run higher here, $137,500, since top earners drag the number up.
- For industrial production managers the Arizona median is $124,810, ranking 20 of 50 states reporting. Mid-band nominal positions are the ones most frequently reordered by the adjustments, because no large wage premium exists to absorb a state's tax or price level.
- Ranked against every occupation Arizona publishes a median for, industrial production managers sits 27 of 491 — the upper quartile of the state's wage distribution. National standing and within-state standing are separate questions, and a job can occupy very different positions on each.
- Because Arizona sits close to the national price level, the real-terms figure for industrial production managers — median $124,810 — tracks the post-tax figure closely: $93,856 retained, $92,830 adjusted. ⚠️ Neither is a wage; the second describes what the first buys. Mean pay of $137,500 exceeds the median, so the upper tail is doing the work.
Compare this career across states
Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.
Pay band: Industrial Production Managers
The state median for this job
| Lowest tenth earn under | $79,410 |
|---|---|
| Half earn under | $124,810 |
| Top tenth earn over | $199,440 |
| This salary | $124,810 |
Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.
The same pay, somewhere else
The state median for this job
| Take-home in Arizona | $93,856 |
|---|---|
| Take-home in Texas | $96,574 |
| Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity | +$6,551 |
State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.
What you would need there
The state median for this job
| To match take-home only | $120,861 |
|---|---|
| You could take a cut of | −$9,135 |
| Prices in Texas | 97 vs 101 |
State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.
Sources and assumptions
- A median is the middle, not an offer. Half of industrial production managers in Arizona earn under $124,810 and half over. The published range runs $79,410 at the tenth percentile to $199,440 at the ninetieth. Experience and employer move an individual a long way inside that.
- One filer, no dependants, no pension contributions — that is the household behind Arizona's $93,856, worked from $124,810. That is on purpose. It lets states be compared with each other, not with each other's family circumstances. Local city taxes are left out. Locally this work ranks 27 of 491.
- Two cautions on $92,830, the adjusted value of that $124,810 median. It levels out prices with a single number for all of Arizona. No actual address matches that. The wage figures and price figures are also from different years. Each is published on its own timetable. This work sits at 27 of 491 locally.
- Figures are distribution medians for industrial production managers in Arizona, not entry or offer rates. The published band runs $79,410 to $199,440; within-state dispersion of that width routinely exceeds the dispersion between states, so tenure, employer and metropolitan area predict an individual's pay better than geography does.
- The Arizona take-home of $93,856, on $124,810 for work ranking 27 of 491 locally, models the simplest household deliberately: holding it constant is what makes the interstate comparison meaningful. It also means the absolute figure overstates liability for most real filers, and municipal income taxes are outside the model entirely. The occupation ranks 27 of 491 in the state.
- This $92,830 adjusted figure, worked from $124,810, rests on a state-level price parity averaging over within-state dispersion larger than much of the between-state dispersion. Wage and price vintages differ by publication schedule. The result is directionally sound and not address-specific, for work at 27 of 491 in the state. The occupation ranks 27 of 491 locally.
Questions people ask
Is this the average pay for the job?
No — it is the middle. Half of these workers earn more and half earn less. The average is $137,500, pulled upward by the top of the range, which is why the middle is the fairer number to plan against.
Why is the pay range for this job so wide?
Because one job title covers very different work. The bottom tenth here earn $79,410 and the top tenth $199,440 — experience, employer and specialism separate them, and a single figure hides all three.
Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?
The number and the value are different things. Arizona costs more than the national average, so this take-home stretches like $92,830 rather than its face figure.
Where does the difference between the wage and my paycheck go?
Into four separate taxes, not one. Federal income tax, Social Security and Medicare apply everywhere, and Arizona adds its own income tax on top — which is why $93,856 of this wage survives to your account.
Why is this job missing from some states?
The survey withholds small samples rather than publish an unreliable number. Pay appears for 50 states here, and a missing state means too few reports, not no jobs.
How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?
The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Arizona is $137,500. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.
What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?
Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($79,410) and the ninetieth ($199,440) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.
How does the state price level affect real compensation?
Arizona's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $92,830 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.
What accounts for the gap between gross wage and take-home here?
Take-home of $93,856 reflects federal income tax, OASDI, Medicare and Arizona income tax for a single filer with no adjustments. The state layer is levied in addition to the federal one; only its rate and base differ between states.
Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?
BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 50 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.